Budget deal: A gimmick that just might work

Summary

  • The bipartisan committee tasked with developing a budget for the federal government by December 13 delivered a deal ahead of schedule.
  • The compromise will be voted on by the House later this week and provides more deficit reduction than what is called for under the sequester.
  • It is highly likely that there will be just enough support to pass this budget into law, taking the threat of a government shutdown off the table.

To end the standoff that partially closed the government at the beginning of October, a bipartisan committee headed by Senator Patty Murray and Representative Paul Ryan was tasked with developing a budget for the federal government by December 13. The committee delivered a deal ahead of schedule.

The compromise, which will be voted on by the House later this week, would set 2014 discretionary spending at $1.012 trillion and 2015 discretionary spending a bit higher—more than what is called for under the sequester. The caps on discretionary spending came about as a result of a failure in November 2011 to come up with a long-term deficit reduction plan. However, because of revenues from higher fees on airline passengers, higher fees for the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, federal employees bearing more of the cost of retirement benefits, and a two-year extension of the 2% cut in Medicare (all the way out in 2022 and 2023), the deal actually cuts the U.S. budget deficit by approximately $20 billion.

These budgets are rarely abided by when they purport to restrain future years’ spending; therefore, I view a commitment to reduce spending in 10 years as a bit of gimmickry. However, because the plan on the table reduces the deficit relative to just keeping the sequester in place for 2014, it could gather just enough Republican support to pass through the House. The challenge will then be in getting the bill through the Senate. The plan doesn’t extend unemployment insurance benefits, and it requires federal employees to shoulder more of the burden of their retirement benefits. These could be significant obstacles to unanimous Democrat support because many Democrats have asked for an extension of unemployment benefits and to not burden federal employees further. President Obama has endorsed the bill as a first step, so that may help galvanize support.

It is highly likely that there will be just enough support to pass this budget into law—a first since April 2009. More important, passing a budget will take the threat of a government shutdown off the table. The budget deal doesn’t do anything about the debt ceiling, so that could still be used as part of the political game in Washington, but this compromise makes it a lot less likely that politics in D.C. will adversely affect consumer, investor, or business sentiment.

This entry was posted in Economic Analysis. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.

Your questions and comments really matter to us! We're glad you want to join the conversation and connect with other AdvantageVoice readers. All we ask is that you keep some simple guidelines in mind:

  • Stay on-topic. Only comments that are related to the subject of the blog entry will be posted.
  • Be respectful. It's okay if you disagree with a post or comment, but please, no personal attacks or offensive language.
  • Maintain your privacy and confidentiality. Please do not provide any of your specific account details or other personal information! If you have immediate service needs, please contact your bank representative or Customer Service.
  • Wells Fargo team members: In the interest of full disclosure, if you are a current employee of or are associated with Wells Fargo, please make note of your affiliation.